F
APPEALS, ACTIONS, AND SHOW CAUSE HEARINGS
F-a
Attachments:
BBA25-0011 Staff Report.pdf, BBA25-0011
APPLICATION.pdf,
251001_336SST_LPC303_BoardAppeals_Write-up.pdf
Applicant and Architect Caleb Marquard presented the case to the
Board. Requesting petitioning for a Motion and Approval to grant
relief from IFC 507.5.1.1 requiring installation of fire hydrant within
100’ radius of any newly installed FDC, when other existing
hydrants exist within proximity.
M. Reddmann gave the staff report. Staff recommend this
application be denied as it does not meet the standards for
approval, the code has not been misinterpreted, the provisions of
the code do apply, and the current condition is less safe than the
minimum requirements of section 1011.5.2 and section 1011.6 of the
2015 Michigan Building Code. The basis of this appeal suggests,
what is proposed is equal or better than what the code requires but
is not proven as such by the information provided in this appeal.
Based on the requirements of the 2015 Michigan Building Code
section 1011.5.2 staff recommends the board deny this request and
require new construction elements meet the minimum requirements
of the 2015 Michigan Building Code as required by the 2015
Michigan Rehabilitation Code for Existing Buildings Section 801.3.
The applicant states they cannot alter the structure because it is in
the Historic district, but have not provided any information
indicating that it is technically infeasible to reconfigure the interior to
accommodate a code compliant stair geometry or a code compliant
landing.
Following discussion between board members, applicant and city
staff, K. Cox made a motion to table the appeal for 60 days while
applicant explores other options/departments for obtaining the
approval they are seeking. Seconded by B. Hart. Motion carries
unanimously.
G
H
OLD BUSINESS
None
NEW BUSINESS