None.
10.
REGULAR BUSINESS – Project Presentation, Staff Report, Public Hearing or
Dedicated Public Comment, and Discussion of Each Item
10-a.
Street and 102, 106 South First Street) PUD Rezoning and Site Plan for
City Council: Proposed fully electric, 10-story mixed-use development with
285 units (studios, 1BR, 2BR; 15% at 60% AMI affordable) and amenity
spaces. The ground floor will have covered parking with EV charging, and
access via West Washington Street. The first floor will have additional
covered parking and coffee shop retail, and access via South First Street.
Floors 1-10 will have residential units and the 10th floor will feature a
rooftop bar. A dedicated entrance will be provided off South First Street.
Various sustainability features are included. Site partially in floodplain
fringe; zoned D2 Downtown Interface, First Street Overlay District,
Secondary Street Designation and located in Ward 5.
Staff Recommendation: Approval
PETITIONER PRESENTATION:
Ryan Talbot, Talbot Development presented the proposed request.
STAFF PRESENTATION:
Senior Planner, Joshua Shake presented the staff report.
PUBLIC HEARING:
Amy Barnett, 111 North Ashley Street, asked whether the proposed units
would be condominiums or rentals and inquired about resident parking.
Brandon Andies, 300 Glenwood Street, expressed opposition to the
proposal, voicing concerns over demolition of a historic building,
opportunities for public involvement, impacts to existing employees, and
possible closures of Huron Street during construction.
Dan Gunning, 626 Westwood Avenue, expressed opposition to the
proposal, citing concerns regarding the building's design, height,
pedestrian accessibility, affordability provisions, and impacts on existing
businesses. He expressed support for the current zoning.
John Marucci, 111 North Ashley Street, expressed opposition to the
proposal, citing concerns regarding light pollution, sewer infrastructure,
and the proposed street closure.
Robert Helber, 1890 Encore Lane, expressed support for the project,
noting occupancy challenges within the Arbor Atrium building, difficulties
faced by existing businesses, and that the building has not been