F-a
STAFF PRESENTATION:
Building Official Mike Lemieux presented the staff report. Staff
recommends this application be denied as it does not meet the
standards for approval, the code has not been misinterpreted, the
provisions of the code do apply, and the building department is unable to
confirm an equal of better form of construction has been provided.
The Building Official’s determination is based on the following sections of
the 2015 MRC:
• Section R301.1.3 (Engineered Design): "Where a building or portion
thereof utilizes
elements not conforming to the prescriptive provisions of this code, those
elements shall be
designed in accordance with accepted engineering practice."
Note: There are no prescriptive tables in the MRC for attaching
structures to living trees.
• Section R104.11 (Alternative materials, design and methods of
construction): This section
allows the Building Official to approve alternatives, provided they are
found to be
"satisfactory and comply with the intent of the provisions of this code."
However, it explicitly
states the Building Official shall require supporting data to assist in the
approval.
• Section R106.1 (Submittal Documents): Authorizes the Building Official
to require
construction documents prepared by a registered design professional
when the complexity
of the work warrants it.
APPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE:
Zachary Adams, property owner, presented the proposed request.
BOARD DISCUSSION:
The Board took into consideration the presented petition and discussed
the matter.
[For a complete record of the discussion, please see available video
format].
Moved by Hart, Seconded by Flack.
In the case of BBA26-00002, the appeal of the building official’s
decision to 1620 Hill Boulevard is granted relief from section